[2026] Short Notes Political Parties Class 10, For Quick Learning!

Chapter 4 of the Democratic Politics Class 10 is very lengthy and confusing, with similar topics.

Therefore, preparing it for the exam needs short, to-the-point notes. And “Short Notes Political Parties Class 10” solve that purpose.

Also Read| Explanation to Political Parties

Main idea:

Political parties = most visible face of democracy
• For most citizens, democratic ≈ political parties
• Even remote/less-educated citizens know parties better than the Constitution

Visibility ≠ Popularity

• Parties are highly visible but not always trusted
• Common public view:

  • Blame parties for democracy’s flaws
  • See parties as sources of social & political division
  • Leads to a key question:❓ Do we even need political parties?

Definition

• A group of people who come together to:

  • Contest elections
  • Hold power in government
    • Agree on policies & programmes for society
    • Goal: Promote the collective good

Why Parties Persuade

• Different views exist on “what is good for all.”
• Parties:

  • Persuade people why their policies are better
  • Seek popular support through elections
  • Aim to implement policies by winning mandates

Why Parties Persuade

• Different views exist on “what is good for all.”
• Parties:

  • Persuade people why their policies are better
  • Seek popular support through elections
  • Aim to implement policies by winning mandates

Parties Reflect Society

• Mirror fundamental political divisions in society
• Represent a part of society → involves partisanship
• A party is known by:

  • Which part does it stand for
  • Which policies does it supports
  • Whose interests it upholds

Three Components of a Party

1️⃣ Leaders

Set vision, strategy & public face

2️⃣ Active Members

Organise, campaign & drive party work

3️⃣ Followers

Support, vote & amplify party message

Fill political offices + Exercise political power

1. Contest Elections

• Elections are fought mainly between party-nominated candidates
Candidate selection methods:

  • USA style: Party members/supporters choose
  • India style: Top party leaders choose
    • Trend: More countries adopting member-driven selection

2. Aggregate Opinions → Policies

• Citizens hold vast, varied views on society
• Parties group similar opinions → form clear policy directions
Reduce the multitude of views into a few basic positions
• Ruling party’s line becomes the basis for government policies

3. Make Laws

• Laws formally debated/passed in the legislature
• But most legislators follow party direction
• Personal opinions take a backseat to party discipline

4. Form & Run Governments

Big policy decisions taken by the political executive of parties

  • Parties:
    • Recruit leaders
    • Train them
    • Appoint ministers to run the government

5. Play Opposition Role

• Losing parties voice alternative views
• Criticise the government for:

  • ❌ Policy failures
  • ❌ Wrong decisions
    Mobilise public opposition to keep power accountable

Shape Public Opinion

• Raise & highlight key societal issues
• Leverage lakhs of members/activists nationwide
• Pressure groups often = party extensions in society
• Launch movements to resolve people’s problems
• Public opinions often crystallise along party lines

7. Provide Access to Government

• For citizens: Local party leader = easier contact than government officer
• Parties help people access:

  • Government machinery
  • Welfare schemes
    • Parties stay responsive to public needs
  • Else: Risk rejection in the next election

The 7 functions of parties = direct answer to “Why do we need them?”
But a deeper question remains:

Why can’t modern democracies exist WITHOUT parties?

Thought Experiment: Democracy Without Parties

Imagine elections with only independent candidates:

❌ No one can promise major policy changes
❌ Government formed → but utility remains uncertain
❌ Representatives accountable to locality only
No one is responsible for how the whole country is run

→ Result: Fragmented, unstable, directionless governance

Real-World Proof: Non-Party Panchayat Elections

• In many states, panchayat elections are formally non-party
• Yet, villages still split into factions
• Each faction puts up its own “panel” of candidates
This is exactly what parties do!
• Informal groups = de facto parties

Global Pattern

• Political parties exist in almost all countries:

  • Big or small
  • Old or new
  • Developed or developing
    • Universal presence = functional necessity, not accident

Historical Link: Parties + Representative Democracy

• Rise of parties = directly linked to the rise of representative democracies
Large, complex societies need:

1️⃣ Agency to gather diverse views on issues
2️⃣ Mechanism to bring representatives together → form a responsible government
3️⃣ System to support the OR restrain the government
4️⃣ Process to make, justify, or oppose policies

Political parties fulfil ALL these needs

One-Party System

• Only one party is allowed to control the government
• Example: China (Communist Party only)


Not democratic because:

  • No free competition for power
  • No fair chance for alternatives
    Democratic systems must allow at least two parties

Two-Party System

  • Power alternates between two main parties
  • Other parties may exist → win few seats
  • But only two have a serious chance to form a government
  • Examples: USA, UK
    • ✅ Pros: Stable governments, clear accountability
    • ⚠️ Cons: May limit representation of diverse views

Multiparty System

  • Several parties compete; 3+ have a real chance to win
  • The government is often formed via coalitions/alliances
  • Example: India

✅ Pros:

  • Represents diverse interests & opinions
  • Inclusive of regional, social, and ideological groups

⚠️ Cons:

  • Can appear messy
  • Risk of political instability

🤔 So, Which System Is Best?

Party systems aren’t chosen — they evolve over time

Shaped by:

  • Nature of society & social/regional divisions
  • History of politics
  • Electoral system design
    • Example: India’s multiparty system fits its huge diversity
  • Social + geographical complexity ≠ easily absorbed by 2–3 parties

Federal democracies → Two types of parties:


State parties:


Present in only one federal unit


National parties:


Present in several/all units

In India, National parties have state units that follow the same policies, programmes & strategy decided at the national level

Election Commission & Party Recognition

All parties must register with the Election Commission (EC)


EC treats all equally → but offers special facilities to large/established parties:

● Unique election symbol

● Other administrative privileges

Parties receiving these = “Recognised Political Parties”

Criteria for Recognition (EC Guidelines)

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)

  • Founded: 26 November 2012
  • Origin: Emerged from the 2011 anti-corruption movement

Core Ideals:

  • ✅ Accountability
  • ✅ Clean administration
  • ✅ Transparency
  • ✅ Good governance

Electoral Journey

Delhi Breakthrough

Within 1 year of formation:


  • Became the 2nd largest party in the Delhi Legislative Assembly
  • Formed a government with INC support

Gujarat Expansion (2022)


  • Emerged as the third front in Gujarat politics
  • Signalled growth beyond traditional strongholds

Bahujan Samaj Party ( B S P )

Formation & Leadership


Founded: 1984
Founder-Leader: Kanshi Ram
Core Purpose: Represent & secure power for Bahujan Samaj

Who Is “Bahujan Samaj”?


Dalits
Adivasis
Other Backward Classes (OBCs)
Religious minorities
→ United for social justice & political empowerment

Ideological Inspiration


Draws from the teachings of:
Sahu Maharaj
Mahatma Phule
Periyar Ramaswami Naicker
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
→ Focus: Equality, dignity, anti-caste oppression

Core Mission


Secure interests & welfare of:

  • Dalits
  • Oppressed & marginalised communities
    • Advocate for social transformation through political power

Geographic Base


Main stronghold: Uttar Pradesh
Substantial presence in:

  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Uttarakhand
  • Delhi
  • Punjab

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

Formation & Roots


• Founded: 1980
• Revived from: Bharatiya Jana Sangh (formed in 1951 by Syama Prasad Mukherjee)
• Historical link: Carries forward the ideological legacy of the Jana Sangh

Core Ideology


Vision: Build a strong, modern India inspired by:

  • India’s ancient culture & values
  • Deendayal Upadhyaya’s ideas:
    • Integral Humanism
    • Antyodaya (upliftment of the last person)
      Cultural nationalism (‘Hindutva‘) = central to its view of nationhood

Key Policy Positions


Jammu & Kashmir: Full territorial & political integration with India
Uniform Civil Code: For all citizens, irrespective of religion
Religious conversions: Supports ban on forced/conversion activities

Communist Party of India – Marxist (CPI-M)

Formation & Ideology


Founded: 1964
Core Belief: Marxism-Leninism
Supports:

  • Socialism
  • Secularism
  • Democracy
    Opposes:
    • Imperialism
    • Communalism

Democratic Approach


• Accepts democratic elections as a useful tool
• Goal: Use the electoral process to secure socio-economic justice in India
→ Believes in change through participation, not rejection of the system

Economic Stance


Critical of new economic policies that allow:

  • Free flow of foreign capital
  • Free flow of foreign goods
    → Advocates for a self-reliant, equitable economic model

Indian National Congress INC

Formation & Legacy


Founded: 1885 → One of the oldest parties in the world

Popular name: Congress Party

Historical note: Experienced many splits over its long history

Post-Independence role: Played a dominant role in Indian politics at national & state levels for decades

Vision & Leadership


• Under Jawaharlal Nehru:

  • Sought to build a modern, secular, democratic republic in India
    Ideological orientation: Centrist (neither rightist nor leftist)
    Core values:
    • Secularism
    • Welfare of weaker sections & minorities
    • Economic reforms with a human face

National People’s Party

Formation & Leadership


Founded: July 2013
Founder-Leader: P.A. Sangma
Historic milestone:

Core Philosophy


Believes in:

  • Diversity of India
  • Recognition that different regions face different developmental challenges
    Mission:
    • Education for all
    • Employment for all
    • Empowerment of all sections of society

Geographic Base & Power

Formed government in:

  • 🟢 Meghalaya (home state)
    Presence across:
  • Many North-Eastern states
    → Focus: Regional development + inclusive growth

Definition


• Classified by the Election Commission as ‘State parties’

• Commonly called “regional parties”

• But not necessarily regional in ideology or outlook

Two Types of State Parties

All-India Reach, Limited Success


• Have a national-level organisation with units in several states

• But succeeded only in some states

Examples:

  • 🟡 Samajwadi Party (SP)
  • 🟡 Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD)

State-Identity Focused


• Conscious about specific State identity & issues

Examples:

  • Biju Janata Dal (BJD) – Odisha
  • Sikkim Democratic Front (SDF) – Sikkim
  • Mizo National Front (MNF) – Mizoram
  • Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) – Telangana

Political Impact

Coalition Era


• National parties compelled to ally with State parties

Since 1996: Nearly every State party joined one or more national-level coalition governments

Federalism Boost


This alliance culture has:

  • ✅ Strengthened federalism
  • ✅ Deepened democracy in India

Premise

• Political parties = crucial for democracy to function
• But parties = the most visible face of democracy
→ So: People naturally blame parties
for whatever goes wrong with democracy

Global Pattern of
Dissatisfaction

Worldwide: People express
strong dissatisfaction with parties
• Criticism focuses on:

❌ Failure of parties to
perform their functions well

Political parties must face and overcome these challenges
• Why?

✅ To remain effective instruments of democracy

Challenge #1: Lack of Internal Democracy

Core Issue


Global tendency: Power concentrated in one or few top leaders
•Parties often fail to practice democracy within their own structure
How can parties promote democracy outside, if not inside?

⚠️ Symptoms of Internal Undemocratic Practice

Weak Organisational Systems


❌ No membership registers maintained
❌ No regular organisational meetings held
❌ No timely internal elections conducted

Ordinary Members Marginalised


❌ Lack sufficient information about party functioning
❌ Lack of means or connections to influence decisions
❌ Voice and participation = limited or symbolic

Consequences

Power Centralisation

• Leaders assume greater power
to make decisions
• Decisions taken in the name of the party
by a few individuals

Culture of Personal
Loyalty

• Dissenters find it difficult to continue
at the party
Personal loyalty to leader > Loyalty to party principles/policies
→ Shift from ideological commitment to leader-centric allegiance

Challenge #2: Dynastic Succession

Link to First Challenge


• Dynastic succession = directly related to lack of internal democracy
• When parties lack open, transparent procedures → ordinary workers have few pathways to rise

⚠️ How Dynasty Takes Root

Closed Entry to Leadership


• ❌ No merit-based promotion system
• ❌ Ordinary members = stuck at bottom
• ✅ Leaders hold an unfair advantage to favour:

  • Close associates
  • Family members

Family Control of Top Posts


• In many parties: Top positions are always held by one family
• Creates hereditary leadership instead of elected/merit-based

Why This Is Problematic


Unfair to Party Members


• Hardworking, capable members = denied opportunity
• Merit takes a backseat to birthright or proximity

Bad for Democracy


• People with inadequate experience or low popular support occupy power
• Weakens the quality of leadership & public trust

Global Reality


• Not just an India-specific issue
• Present in some measure worldwide
• Even observed in older, established democracies

Challenge #3: Money & Muscle Power

Core Issue


Growing role of money and muscle power in parties
• Especially prominent during elections
• Parties focused only on winning → tend to use short-cuts

⚠️ How Money Dominates


Candidate Selection


• Parties nominate candidates who:

  • 💰 Have lots of money
  • 💰 Can raise lots of money
    → Merit, integrity, public service = take a backseat

Influence of Funders


Rich individuals & big companies that fund parties:

  • 🎛️ Gain influence over policies & decisions
  • 🗣️ Shape party agenda to serve private interests
    → Risk: Policy captured by wealth, not a public good

💪 Muscle Power & Criminalisation


Dark Alliance


• In some cases, Parties support criminals who can win elections
• Why?

  • 💪 Muscle power = perceived electoral advantage
  • 🗳️ “Winnability” prioritised over character or competence

Global Concern


• Democrats worldwide worried about:

  • 📈 Increasing role of rich people in politics
  • 🏢 Growing influence of big corporations
    → Threat to fair representation & democratic integrity

Challenge #4: Lack of Meaningful Choice

Core Issue


Parties often fail to offer meaningful choices to voters
• For real choice: Parties must be significantly different in ideology & policy
→ But this difference is declining worldwide

Global Trend: Ideological Convergence


Example: Britain


Labour Party vs Conservative Party:

  • ✅ Agree on fundamental aspects
  • ❌ Differ only in the details of policy framing or implementation
    Minimal ideological gap

India’s Reality


Major parties: Differences on economic policies have reduced
• Result:

  • ❌ Voters wanting really different policies = no option available

Leadership Shuffle = Limited Choice


Same Faces, Different Labels


• The same set of leaders keeps shifting from one party to another
• Voters cannot elect truly different leaders
Personality over principle dominates politics

Why This Matters


• Democracy thrives on genuine alternatives
• When parties converge:

  • ❌ Voter choice becomes symbolic, not substantive
  • ❌ Public disillusionment increases
  • ❌ Policy innovation stagnates

1. Anti-Defection Law (Constitutional Amendment)

Purpose

• Prevent elected MLAs and MPs from changing parties after the election
• Why needed?

  • Many representatives defected to:
    • Become ministers
    • Receive cash rewards
      Undermined electoral mandate & party stability

⚖️ Legal Provision

• Law mandates:

  • If MLA/MP voluntarily gives up party membership OR
  • Votes against party whip without permission
    → They face disqualification from the legislature

2. Internal Party Democracy Measures

Election Commission Requirements

• Political parties must:

✅ Hold internal elections regularly
✅ File income tax returns annually

⚠️ Reality Check

• These requirements often become mere formality

Unclear if this has led to:

  • Greater transparency
  • Real internal democracy
  • Empowerment of ordinary members

3. Law to Regulate Internal Party Affairs

Organisational Transparency


• ✅ Maintain register of members

  • Track membership, participation, rights
    • ✅ Follow its own constitution
  • No arbitrary rule changes by leadership

Independent Dispute Resolution


• ✅ Independent authority to act as judge in:

  • Party disputes
  • Internal conflicts

Hold open elections for the highest posts

4. Women’s Quota in Political Parties

Mandatory: ~one-third of tickets to women candidates
Quota for women in party decision-making bodies

5. State Funding of Elections

Government should fund elections – give parties money for election expenses
Support in kind: petrol, paper, telephone, etc.
Or support in cash: based on votes secured

Two More Ways to Reform Parties

1️⃣ Public Pressure

• People can put pressure on parties through:

  • Petitions, publicity, agitations
    Ordinary citizens, pressure groups, movements, and media can play an important role
    • If parties fear losing public support, they become more serious about reforms

2️⃣ Join Parties to Change Them

• Political parties can improve if those who want reform join them
• Quality of democracy depends on the degree of public participation
• Difficult to reform politics if citizens only criticise from the outside
• Problem of bad politics → solved by more and better politics



Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top